No. 25-5821

Gregory Lee Rodvelt v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-10-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure fifth-amendment official-duties sixth-amendment statutory-authority
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FifthAmendment TradeSecret Privacy
Latest Conference: 2025-11-14
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Is a federal employee "engaged in. . . the performance of official duties"
to sustain a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 111 when there is no statutory
authority for the employee's actions?

2. When the district court inadvertently discloses privileged information to
the government and the government utilizes that privileged information
to gain a strategic advantage at trial, are a criminal defendant's Fifth
and Sixth Amendment Rights violated?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a federal employee is 'engaged in the performance of official duties' under 18 U.S.C. § 111 when lacking statutory authority, and whether inadvertent disclosure of privileged information by a district court violates a criminal defendant's constitutional rights

Docket Entries

2025-11-17
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/14/2025.
2025-10-22
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-10-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 6, 2025)

Attorneys

Rodvelt Gregory
Devin Donaghy HusebyFederal Public Defender for the District of Oregon, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent