Errol Victor, Sr. v. Louisiana
DueProcess FifthAmendment FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
WHETHER A STATE RACIALLY MOTIVATED PERVASIVE Unconstitutional Statute
purposed to deny it's African American Citizens their equal protection of
law guaranteed to all citizens by the Mth Amendment U.S. Constitution is
in legal contemplation "Government Oppression "? (Green v. U.S., Infra).
WHETHER TRIAL COMMENCE AND ADJOINS Absent a Unanimous Jury Verdict, as well
as , Absent a "Manifest Necessity" on record of a Judicially Declared Mis
trial, is in legal contemplation an "Incompleted Trial" Wherein Double Jeop
ardy bars Reprosecution? (Arizona v. Washington, Infra))
WHETHER UNCONSTITUTIONAL INCOMPLETED TRIALS Resulting in Purposeful Manufac
tured Wrongful Convictions of African American Citizens Delibrately-, .INTELLI
-GENTLY, KNOWINGLY, enacted by the State of Louisiana. Legislative Body, is in
legal contemplation "Void Abinitial ," in violation of the FIFTH AMENDMENT of
the U.S. Constitution and Establishes Entitlement to an Implicit Acquittal?
WHETHER THE COURTS OF LOUISIANA Exceeded the Scope/Cabin of the United •.■ •
States Supreme Court's Order, Judgement and Mandamus on Remand in Cases that
were "Vacated" relevant to it's Holding in Victor v. Louisiana?
FARETTA. v. CALIFORNIA , 422, U.S. 806, STATE vDUGAR , 354 So. 3d 881 (La.2023)
DOES NOT THE DENIAL OF SELF REPRESENTATION "Without the Finding of Severe
Mental Illness" Deny Pre-Trial Denfendant's Sixth Amendment Right of the U.S.
Constitution? As such, Precludes all Discussions, Proceedings, Rulings and
Judgements by the Courts Thereafter?
STATE v. REVISE, 340, So. 3d 864 (La. 10/01/20), La.C.Cr.P. Art. 582
WAS NOT THE PRE-TRIAL DENIAL OF SELF REPRESENTATION Without a required
Faretta Hearing held for a period of OVER ONE YEAR (23 Months Evident Prima
Facie) while held incarcerated on Remand of the "Vacate" of Aggrieved Appel
lant's Conviction and Sentence, in violation of La.C.Cr.P. Art. 582, One-
Year Time-Limitation Prescription for Commencement Of Retrial? As such,
Establishes as REMEDY, Defendant's Entitlement to Reversal and Subsequent
Release Pursuant to the 6th U.S.C.A. Incorporated to the States by the U.S.C.
14th Amendment?
WHETHER A DEFENDANT CAN BE COMPELLED TO ARGUE OVER 20 motions before Court
Pre-trial Pro-Se, Without a Faretta Hearing previously Held, is in violation '
of the Sixth Amendment,Structure Error , Gross Procedure Departure on the face
of the Record that Establishes Entitlement to Reversal? Faretta v. Ca., Infra.
IS
Whether a state's racially motivated statute denying African American citizens equal protection is considered government oppression under the U.S. Constitution