No. 25-5845

Ohio, ex rel. Christopher Michael Williams v. Marilyn Zayas, Judge, First District Court of Appeals, Hamilton County, Ohio, et al.

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2025-10-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment due-process equal-protection equitable-tolling judicial-immunity state-court-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2025-12-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a state Court Judge commit a violation of a Defendant's 14th Amendment rights to the United States Constitution for Due process and equal protection of the law when they deny equitable tolling under an Ohio statute due to an erroneous mischaracterization of a motion to reconsider?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

#1: Does a state Court Judge, commit a violation of a Defendants 14th Amendment rights to the United States Constitution for Due process, and equal protection of the law, when they deny them equitable tolling under an Ohio statute, due to an erroneous mischaracterization of a motion to reconsider? QUESTION #2: When it comes to the question of 11th Amendment Immunity for a state, and Judicial immunity for violation of a Defendants 14th Amendment rights to the United States Constitution for Due process, and equal protection of the law; Is it an administrative act, or a judicial act by a State Court judge, when a statute from state legislature commands that an act shall be done if elements are met? QUESTION #3: When it comes to the question of 11th Amendment Immunity for a state, and Judicial immunity for violation of a Defendants 14th Amendment rights to the United States Constitution for Due process, and equal protection of the law; are there acts commanded by state legislature, that compel judges to do an act, in a way, where there is no discretionary conduct applicable? Page 2 of 18

Docket Entries

2025-12-15
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 10, 2025)

Attorneys

Christopher Michael Williams
Christopher Michael Williams — Petitioner
Christopher Michael Williams — Petitioner