No. 25-5848

Cedric Milburn v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-10-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process government-cooperation rule-35b sentencing-reduction
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-11-14
Question Presented (from Petition)

There is a conflict among the United States Courts of Appeals regarding the proper interpretation of Federal Rue of Criminal Procedure 35(b).

The question is: w hether Rule 35(b) gives criminal defendants the right to notice and the opportunity to be heard before a district court can resolve a motion for a sentencing reduction based on cooperation with the government (as the Second, Fourth, and Sixth Circuits hold) , or whether it does not give defendants these rights (as the Fifth Circuit holds).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Rule 35(b) gives criminal defendants the right to notice and opportunity to be heard before a district court resolves a motion for sentencing reduction based on government cooperation

Docket Entries

2025-11-17
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/14/2025.
2025-10-28
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-10-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 10, 2025)

Attorneys

Cedric Milburn
Rosa Victoria Garcia-CrossFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent