Whether a petitioner can challenge a state's obstruction of justice conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1503 through federal habeas review when state courts have rejected the challenge

-Vhe. oF oVh\w^ rdr^ o? V^ ’A toner peVA'^ner \s « w^W cf * -£><W^ v^uxSka t>'Ve_ fLVAVonerK cAbb^e.^ cV>*r<cVx^^er-.Ayo^ ^s.sex> A iov^ <>r\(\ A^o. <AW^^k. Cviwxa S<Ab yn^o>' M2 U£.d« § l}$>3> ^c\o.vy^Y 'C-r hx>s cxcVy "t\\etoi-drofV^® \«.wJ< XT> O©eS V^tA^e.ir.s ? UA^Qir AU SQ wvq. <2kcuiosA<at\ceS *S QuesA\o<x Kb CovopkjA^^ ^y«^-*rxpts 5-V<xVt Gorxsi; VA >t>v^ a«x^ 7 Puv$M«ttA Ao ^OhsplAfi — Pr«-e io jAfoo ttocAiArwa.* AVvA sH«>s •Pvo^x tb Sufre^c^ cXojus.e ( IAS, Co>Aj.+» VvtV VI c\lv ^■3} D.i +ke S-Wte oV obVAvonrvcc bo<ize +Ve_ ocu4ko^«'fy prt>Secc4-^ Zil<L|C<aS A hec«>»xc. Gv ■sAe<t-eHoQ -fo 'f-kt pr«'<e^-'VA'>w\4_ Since. Cozt^ress /VO-^er ^ ’.sesWiVskeA aKa l^usc»7 ee. CCYen ib n)oKoo •“-^rzcb'orvj Pbr$va«fAo -vke_~ 18 uscx § ns 3 (V^ortrt ^IISI^ ; r<\ c.,*uo^b } o,5, . (HUs ^AAionorS cK;^ <x’’ vox^ ^o^eA" fbjwrA +© (S bs^A /<S3 AA -pte. s-tate. O-P otkVvcYMH ks'^TT o^cA bucr^v oP 4^;^. d.’orlCP) CScHka Pursvoa to IV U^.$ //s3 fiupr^ C^tpWfk^