No. 25-587
Julio Licinio v. New York, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: burden-shifting case-law employment-discrimination judicial-framework mcdonnell-douglas stare-decisis
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green should be overruled
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792 (1973) , should be overruled .
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-11
Waiver of right of respondent New York, et al. to respond filed.
2025-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 18, 2025)
2025-09-10
Application (25A271) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until November 14, 2025.
2025-09-04
Application (25A271) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 15, 2025 to November 14, 2025, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Julio Licinio
Glenn Evans Roper — Pacific Legal Foundation, Petitioner
Glenn Evans Roper — Pacific Legal Foundation, Petitioner
New York, et al.
Barbara Dale Underwood — New York Solicitor General, Respondent
Barbara Dale Underwood — New York Solicitor General, Respondent