Whether the state violated the petitioner's constitutional rights by withholding exculpatory DNA evidence and denying discovery of potentially innocence-proving materials

1. Why was the DNA allowed to be down played by the state without defense providing proof of its importance at the crime scene? 2. If the state did not have Moore to use to spin the perfect story would they have tried to investigate how two unknown DNA's where found at the scene right next to victims DNA? 3. Was the Petitioners Constitutional Rights violated? 4. Was the Petitioner denied parts of her discovery that proved actual innocence?