No. 25-5915

Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Greenpoint Mortgage Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-AR2

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2025-10-20
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: due-process federal-constitution jurisdiction land-patents supremacy-clause treaty-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the lower court violate Article VI Clause 2 of the Supremacy Clause in relation to Land Patents and treaty laws?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1. Did the lower court violate Article VI Clause 2 as to the Supremacy Clause of Federal Constitution in relation to Land Patents and treaty laws on Land Patents? 2. Did the lower court conceal embezzlement of about $1,200,000 of Petitioner ’s and estate monies 14 days after the close of escrow in a chapter 13 bankruptcy case? 3. Was labeling Petitioner a “vexatious litigant ” by a state actor lawful? 4. Did the lower court ’s failure to consolidate case numbers 17cv314286*the unlawful detainer action with 17cv310716 _ wrongful foreclosure action violate Petitioner's due process rights? -<5. Did Petitioner's invoking Chapter VI, section 18, subdivision (a) of the California Constitution remove the jurisdiction of the actor who issued the vexatious litigant order? 6. Did the courts below violate California Government Code section 68081? 7. Could a court administrator (“judge ”) refuse to consolidate case numbers 17cv314286 and 17cv310716 when the alleged Defendant U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR GREENPOINT MORTGAGE TRUST MORTGAGE PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-AR2 in Case Number 17cv310716 responded to the Petitioner ’s claim, by court administrator ’s relying on the “vexatious litigant order ” ? 8. Did the lower courts and their administrators (“judges ”) violate the law by failing to report the crimes committed by Severson & Werson APC., its attorneys and all officers and directors all other companies involved such as inter alia, Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Clear Recon Corp. , etc. to law enforcement for subsequent actions? -22 9. Did lack of an answer or a demurrer on a remanded case from USDC to the inferior State Court with a Cross Claim entitle Petitioner to a default and a default judgment? 10. Could Petitioner ’s stricken motion for default judgment from the calendar and records by the inferior court administrator (“judge ”), be acted on one day before the previously scheduled hearing by the inferior court without any notices to Petitioner? 11. Did any other derivative action as a direct result of the above such as inter alia harboring, aiding, abetting and shielding Defendants ’ violation of Sherman Anti Trust Act, Bid rigging, Cal. Civ. Code 2924(h) Subdiv.(g) and other Defendants ’ criminal violation of law take place? 12. Did the lower court administrators make reversible errors in not realizing that BAR in 26 states including in California gave CLES to attorneys who took late Dr. Garfield's seminar? 13. Did the lower state court actors admit to treason, subversion and mutiny? 14. Should one of the sovereign people of the united States of America stand on the Constitution, treaty law, Supreme Court rulings, the intend of congress, and other lawful writings of which one is the beneficiary and defend their property against theft and piracy? 15. Which one has the right, against those who have taken an oath to the Constitution of this republic? 16. Which party will be the perpetrator? 17. Would it not be Treason to violate sovereign people's rights secured by the Treaty and the Constitution? 18. Is standing jurisdictional and lack of standing precludes ruling on the merits? 3 19Did the courts below made mistakes in not understanding MERS ’ own terms, conditions and by laws? 20. Aren ’t the actions mentioned above, aiding, abetting, sheltering Cross Defendants ’/Defendants' Criminal activities? 21. Did the lower court violate 18 USC §2 ? 22. Did the lower court and its administrator violate 18 USC § 1512? 23. Did the lower court and its administrator violate 18 U.S. Code § 3? 4 24. Did the lower court and its administrator violate 18 USC § 4, 1510, 1511, 1513-retaliating against a victim, witness or informant, 1514, 1516 ■ Obstruction of Federal audit, 1517 -Obstructing examination of financial institution, 1519 -Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy, § 1520 -Destruction of corporate audit records, etc. etc.? 25. Did the actions of the lower c

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2025-12-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-08-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2025)
2025-05-22
Application (24A1138) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 23, 2025.
2025-04-15
Application (24A1138) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 24, 2025 to August 23, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Fareed Sepehry-Fard
Fareed Sepehry-Fard — Petitioner
Fareed Sepehry-Fard — Petitioner