Whether evidence was sufficient to justify the district court denial of Rule 29 of the Fed. R. Crim. P. and whether the district court committed reversible error by imposing a procedurally unreasonable sentence

No question identified. : QUESTIONS PRE SENTED Whether evidence was sufficient to justify the distric t court denial of Rule 29 of the Fed. R. Crim. P. Whether the distric t court committed reversible error by imposing a procedurally unreasonable sentence PART IES TO THE PRO CEEDING S The Parties to the Insta nt Proceedings Are Contained in the Caption of the Case. TABLE OF CO NTENTS Page Table of Authoritie s. 4 Opinion be low. 8 Jurisdic tion. . 8 Constitutiona l and sta tutory provisions involve d. 8