Whether making a false writing statement to fault a party in a case constitutes a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3), and whether the Chief Judge violated the Fourteenth Amendment by depriving the Petitioner of equal protection and judicial relief

1. While presided the case in the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, Respondent in a particular Order knowingly, willfully made, created false writing statement, committed federal crime in order to fault the Plaintiff as Petitioner. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3), is making, creating false writing statement to fault a party of a case, any case, as such as Respondent did to Petitioner, not a federal crime? 2. Accordingly and undeniably, Respondent is guilty of a federal crime against Petitioner. However, instead of entitling Petitioner to seek relief in the Court, the Chief judge in the proceedings of the case deprived of the Petitioner ’s such right and the right to having the “equal protection of the laws ’' violating the Fourteenth Amendment? App. 60a. While on the other hand, the Chief Judge inserted various unjust reasons to dismiss case, knowingly not bring the crime Respondent committed into consideration. WHY? 3. What was the reason, and why was the Chief Judge of the related U. S. District Court who presided the case complicit with the identified federal criminal as Respondent; silenced Respondent, not removed, not terminated Respondent as the identified federal criminal from the jury of the case, from Office while Petitioner had so requested {see App. 49a, first paragraph) but still retained the criminal as a judge against Petitioner, placed Petitioner under the authority of that criminal and forced Petitioner to withstand the affects and the unbearable mentality pressures to date? 4. Petitioner in the Notice of Appeal had made known to the Eighth Circuit Court that: ii A. Respondent committed federal crime against Petitioner; App. 28a, 29a; B. The presided Chief Judge obstructed Justice, played false innocent, knowingly broke the law, violated the U. S. Constitution to shield the identified federal criminal as Respondent against Petitioner. App. 29a-31a; C. Federal Rule Appellate Procedure, Rule 4 is not always executable, applicable and/or compliable for certain cases or circumstances and the appeal be one. App. 31a-33a. But why were judges in the panel assigned to the case from the Eighth Circuit Court knowingly complicit with the presided Chief Judge as the accomplice, admit to become the secondaiy accomplices, and robotically issued its unjust judgment and “orders that this appeal be dismissedfor lack of jurisdiction as it is untimely 1'’ while facts proved its decision of dismissing the appeal be the very one truly lacked of fair and just jurisdiction? 5. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3), the law identified Respondent is the intentional federal criminal against Petitioner, other than inserting various unacceptable, unfair, unjust reasons dismissing case, to date what had the two related lower Courts done to that federal criminal? And had the two lower Courts done anything to the federal criminal as Respondent to protect Petitioner and to pay back fairness for, Petitioner? 6. Is it safe for Petitioner, anyone in the public and the United States of America for the Courts to have and keep retaining an identified federal criminal as judge as the presided Chief Judge and the panel did? iii 7. Do all judges assigned to the case from the two related lower Courts and Respondent acknowledge that, pursuant to “77ie Citizen ’s Almanac ”, whoever challenges the U. S. Constitution and its ideals (which all related judges in the proceedings of the case had done against Petitioner) is domestic enemy? App. 62a.