When does a record show that the district court thought the sentence it chose was appropriate irrespective of the guidelines within the meaning of Molina-Martinez v. United States, and does Anderson's 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) conviction violate the Second Amendment, and may Congress criminalize intrastate firearm possession based solely on the fact that the firearm crossed state lines at some point before the defendant possessed it?

1. When does a record show “that the district court thought the sentence it chose was appropriate irrespective of the guidelines” within the meaning of MolinaMartinez v. United States, 578 U.S. 189, 198, 200 (2016)? 2. Does Anderson’s 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) conviction violate the Second Amendment? 3. May Congress criminalize intrastate firearm possession based solely on the fact that the firearm crossed state lines at some point before the defendant possessed it? i