1. May the Sixth Amendment in retroactive by the state allow remedy to initial and
successive post-conviction proceedings, if so, may the right to effective assistance of
counsel at trial, direct appeal extend to these proceedings, and if so, may a post
conviction court, on initial or subsequent petition have the authority to reverse,
modify or change the highest court 's opinion and statement of law and with an
innocence claim?

2. Does judicial estoppel doctrine or estoppel by judgment bar misstatements of
law when a judge avoids submitting an aggravated fact to the jury instead imposes
a bench trial equates to a second prosecution with mandatory guidelines 'prior conviction
sentence increase ' to all the indicted convictions found by the judge not the jury,
under federal law and to bar burdens at sentencing on a criminal defendant to
show that if findings require a concurrent sentence in order to reduce his sentence-
from being subject to prior convictions that which otherwise would aggravate the
crime and sentence, here alleged to violate the double jeopardy federal law and on
joinder of alleged counts on two alleged victims, at three different locations, and
bar affirmance that the verdict does not implicate the Sixth Amendment without a
jury poll and without special jury instructions , and does it violate the Eighth
Amendment Ex-post facto, and double jeopardy federal law and fifth amendment
against self-incrimination, Equal privileges or immunities clause federal law, and
fourth amendment interstate extradition, no governors ' warrant?

Whether the Sixth Amendment may be retroactively applied by the state to allow remedy in initial and successive post-conviction proceedings, and whether judicial estoppel bars misstatements of law in sentencing under federal law