Whether a federal district court can compel arbitration and dismiss a complaint involving unauthorized access to consumer proprietary information by telecommunications providers

1. Whether Appellant Valentine ’s federally protected Due Process rights and access to the courts under the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution was violated by the dismissal of the complaint for continued arbitration against Verizon Wireless, LLC. and Verizon Communications, Inc. 2. Whether Appellant Valentine has a right of action under Section 222 of the Federal Communications Act for unauthorized access to her CPNI and other personally identifiable information by hackers and SIM Swaps held by Verizon Wireless, LLC and Verizon Communications, Inc.? 3. Whether section 222 of the Federal Communications Act protects both CPNI and broader categories of consumer proprietary information or only CPNI that is held by vJrizon Wireless, LLC and Verizon communications, Inc.? 4. Whether the US. District Clerk of Court has the right to deny Appellant Valentine ’s application for Entry of Default under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55(a) against defendants Verizon Wireless, LLC and Verizon communications, Inc. for failure to reply to the complaint? 5. Whether the United States District Court has jurisdiction over defendant Verizon Wireless, LLC And Verizon Communications, Inc. after service of process was properly effectuated? 6. Whether the United States District Court failed to review the “four comers ” of the complete contract Verizon Customer Agreement that contains the Arbitration agreement? 7. Whether a permanent restraining order should have issued against Verizon Wireless, LLC and Verizon Communications, Inc. to protect Appellant Valentine ’s CPNI and other personally identifiable information?