Maurice Cruz-Webster v. Brian Emig, Warden, et al.
pressing 'Saues o-£ na-HoncU impor^an^e ; Cuhc-Her
and u)kxx+ exVm-V aKe CnmmcU JaS-We System -holera-tes
9ol\ce o-Wcejro -te5+ vmon\a\ beVe-p's on k/tc4ims d^ihu
d^xlcxra-Kon I CKa+ed u-Ho~ance <5-hxterneM-5 <5pec\4iCallM d/ij
o^H-^ Vic^, KnmMingbf evw^ng ^^ (erW. ww owe Utebf do h<B ,n
kias ck frene^nisj+c 4^ | i-f< .^en+encc and cuocs cenh^l
issue -trial?\V\^bse clya iWApcoyec and anda^ burdensome Cer-H-4^ Ca4<
0^ A-Wea\ab;li-b| Ccaft} 6+andard -+kaf con+raVtnfcs +fc CouH-'s
rrec^deH- and WW) id- dw^d fir. Ctaz.- wdbsker . a ca/> on
hiS Otodwn -ro rtopen -Wml dad^Mmf- and Obtwn m«r,+s r<Vltu/
pra5£C^ a^ (ce
m ' ~ "** txvxCar 'w+u-+'<Jbc'' G'«w+ dVi< "-Wxers dw belief
Whether and to what extent the Criminal Justice System tolerates police officer testimony beliefs on victim declarations and statements specifically related to victim knowledge