1. Should this Court, after independently reviewing the factual record, grant Mr. Wood a new trial based on the Napue violation at his trial, as it did in Glossip?

2. Should this Court grant Mr. Wood a new trial based on the Brady violations shown at the hearing below?

3. Should this Court instead remand this case for a new hearing without the participation of a judge whose potential for bias was too high to be constitutionally tolerable? See Williams v. Pennsylvania, 579 U.S. 1 (2016).

Should the Court grant a new trial based on prosecutorial misconduct involving knowingly false witness testimony and hidden benefits in a capital murder case