1) Harmful Inflation:

a) Is there a difference between "economic
derived inflation" and "purposefully reckless derived
inflation", with the first being a "generalized
grievance", and the second being "a claim upon which
relief can be granted"?

b) Is the harm of Inflation particularized since
tabulating everyone's percent of paycheck used to
pay new price increases would show that Inflation
disproportionately affects the Working Class, while
at the same time, due to increased interest rates and
being able to raise rents on everyone else, Inflation
increases the wealth of Rich People?

2) Traceable to the DNC and RNC:

If Inflation is due to out-of-control money
printing, which is due to an exponential National
Debt, which is due to reckless spending, which is due
to the Politicians not working together to create
Laws preventing reckless spending, which is due to
their unwillingness to work together out of fear of
losing their jobs if they do, which is due to the DNC
and RNC monitoring Congressional votes and
cutting support of the Politicians who "cross the isle",
then...

Can the harm of Inflation very "likely" be traced
to the DNC and RNC?

8) Constitutional Rights Violation:

The Constitution was created to represent "We
the People" and Articles I, II, III (all Section 1's)
establish the legislative, executive, and judicial
branches of government to create a "Separation of
Powers", so...

Does the DNC and RNC violate everyone's
Constitutional Rights by subverting that government
structure. with the current de facto "Separation of
Powers" being Democrats and Republicans, thereby
creating a system where the Politicians no longer
work together for The Will of The People and the
good of The Country, but rather instead the will of
the DNC and RNC (and the good of their donors)
with block-voting in Congress being the proof?

4) Redressability:

Would a Jury verdict that...

a) forces the DNC and RNC to break-up their
Duopoly by financially supporting a Third Party
until each party has 1/3 of the power or...

b) orders an extremely large who-cares-if-theygo-bankrupt Punitive Damages...

..remedy the perpetual harm of the current TwoParty system?

Or instead, should This Court decide...

c) Are any and all parts of the Laws, Regulations
and Rules — that require Congressional Voting and
Committees to be public — unconstitutional in a TwoParty system because it causes Article I, Section 5,
Clause 8 to break the Constitution by no longer
allowing The House and Senate to truly represent
"We the People"?

For instance, to reinforce the Constitutional
Right of "We the People" truly having representation,
Amendments were required to give voting rights to
minorities and women, yet there is nothing to
reinforce the Right of Real Representation with the
current Two-Party system being allowed to monitor
and control the Yeas and Nays, etc, — therefore,
shouldn't This Court blind the overlords until the
legislative branch creates a new Amendment to
expand upon how congressional "Judgment" in
Article I, Section 5, Clause 3 is even possible in a
Two-Party system?

(Ask yourself, why would the DNC and RNC
even fight this one, since they should have faith in
the members of their own parties?)

Whether the two-party political system constitutes a constitutional violation of separation of powers and representation rights, and if punitive damages or third-party support could remedy systemic political dysfunction