Whether permitting a detective to testify to unconfronted, testimonial hearsay statements that directly inculpate a defendant statements, made by witnesses the State chose not to call out of mere convenience, violates the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) and its progeny?

Whether permitting a detective to testify to unconfronted, testimonial hearsay statements that directly inculpate a defendant statements, made by witnesses the State chose not to call out of mere convenience, violates the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004) and its progeny?