Whether the New York Court of Appeals erred in its conclusion regarding the retroactive application of Connecticut Megan's Law and its impact on Mr. Brown's constitutional rights and plea agreement

Weather the Respondent violated the Petitioner Constitutional Rights By acting under color of law? II. Question Presented Whether the New York Court of Appeals, overlooked Mr. Brown ’s arguments that the 1993 Alfred plea was not made intelligently, which the under color of State Law application of the Connecticut Megon ’s Law retroactive Statue, violated Mr. Brown ’s Federal substantive constitutional rights to due process? III. Question Presented Whether the New York Court of Appeal err in its conclusion that the application of the Connecticut Megon ’s Law retroactive Statue did not frustrate Mr. Brown ’s plea agreement contract? 2 L IV. Question Presented Whether the New York Court of Appeal err in its conclusion not to apply the judicial estoppel doctrine? 3