No. 25-6015

Timothy Marcus Mayberry v. Aramark, et al.

Lower Court: Indiana
Docketed: 2025-11-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment pro-se
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. Whether the Court of Appeals of Indiana denies a litigant due process, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, when it selects a singular appellate-issue, then summarily disposes of the other appellate-issues simply because the selected appellate-issue is dispositive?

II. Whether the Court of Appeals of Indiana treats pro se appellants unequally, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, when it applies the appellate rules more rigidly against them?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court of Appeals of Indiana denies a litigant due process and violates the Equal Protection Clause by summarily disposing of appellate issues and applying appellate rules more rigidly against pro se appellants

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-11-24
Waiver of right of respondent Aramark to respond filed.
2025-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 3, 2025)

Attorneys

Aramark
Stephanie SchusterMorgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Respondent
Timothy Marcus Mayberry
Timothy Marcus Mayberry — Petitioner