THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF A HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING IS TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT A MAN IS NOT UNJUSTEY IMPISONED; AND IF FOR SOME UNJUSTIFIABLE REASONS AS IN THIS ENTITLED CAUSE I/HE WAS UNABLED TO ASSERT MY/HOIS RIGHTS OF DUE PROCESS AFTER I/HE WAS MADE AWARE OF SIGNIFICANCE AS A MATERIAL MATTER OF FACTS OF LAWS UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF FEDERAL PUBLIC LAW 42 USCS % 1986; UNDER THE WELL ESTABLISHED HOLDINGS OF STATE OF MISSOURI,S COURT OF APPEALS ,EASTERN DISTRICTS MATTER OF FACTS OF DECISIONAL LAWS GOVERNING RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF UNITED STATES SUPREME COURTS MIRANDA,S DUE PROCESS CLAUSE AS LAW REFERS TO: STATE V. STRICKLIN. 558 S.W.3d 54.

ON THE 16TH DAY OF MAY 2022; U.S DISTRICT COURT CLERK OF COURT VIOLATED FEDERAL PUBLIC LAWS AND STATUES: 18 uses $ 2971; WHICH AS A MATTER OF FACT OF FEBERAL LAW READS AS FOLLOWS: WHOEVER BEING CLERK OF U.S.DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES: WILLFULLY REFUSES OR NEGLECTS TO MAKE OR FORWARD ANY REPORT.CERTIFICATE STATEMENT OR DOCUMENTAS REQUIRED BY LAW SHALL BE FINED OR IMPISONED: UNDER THIS TITLE.

LAW UNDER STATUE: 18 USCS $161001 (a); DISTRICT COURTS ACTIONS IN FILED PETITIONS FOR RELIEF UNDER CONGRESSES FEDERAL LAWS EXTENDED BY FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS STATUE:1983;(reads as follows) ;
any individual NOT JUST STATES PRISONERS HAS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BRING CIVIL ACTIONS AND OR SUITS AGAINST THE STATE IN QUESTION OR STATES LOCAL GOVERNMENTS EMPLOYEES: FOR VIOLATIONS OR DEPRIVATIONS OF RIGHTS OF DUE PROCESS: UINDER COLOROF ANY STATUE, ORDINANCE: REGULATION: CUSTOM OR USAGE OF STATE OR TERITORY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Whether a federal district court clerk's alleged failure to process legal documents constitutes a violation of due process rights under federal civil rights statutes