No. 25-6043

In Re Alex Smith

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-11-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment due-process habeas-corpus miranda-violations post-conviction supervisory-control
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2025-12-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court and Montana Supreme Court violated the petitioner's due process rights under the 14th Amendment by denying habeas relief, ignoring motions, and suppressing evidence of innocence

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Questions of Law •* 1. Was it a violation of a postconviction petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause 'of 'the 14th Amendment* to the U.S. Constitution, for the district court not to grant default judgment at hearing on 07-14-2025, given he was without counsel? > 2. Did Montana supreme court violate petitioner's rights under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Const, by denying Writ of Supervisory Control to take control over dist. court which ignored motions on purpose, that were sent by the petitioner, from after 09-07-2023 until ordered to respond by the supreme court and.then .for the supreme court to ignore newly discovered Miranda violations petitioner brought up in motions to convert postconviction to habeas corpus (and both courts suppressing information concerning petitioner's innocence)?

Docket Entries

2025-12-08
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-04-22
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Alex Smith
Alex Smith — Petitioner
Alex Smith — Petitioner