Whether the U.S. Supreme Court has a constitutional duty to issue a mandamus to the 5th Circuit to reverse void judgments and address alleged jurisdictional errors in a long-running civil litigation
1. IS NON-PARTY, AND NON-CITED, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (“USA ”) AND DIST. CT. JUDGE, DONALD E. WALTER, ONE AND SAME INDIVIUAL PERSON, AND/OR, ONE AND SAME FEDERAL OFFICER, AND, IF NOT, WAS PETITIONER ’S SUIT FILED IN CADDO PARISH STATE COURT EVER REMOVED TO FEDERAL COURT, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE RECORD SHOWS THAT ONLY NON-PARTY THE USA APPEARED IN THE NOTICE OF REMOVAL? 2. IS IT A CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY OF THIS U. S. SUPREME COURT TO ISSUE A MANDAMUS TO THE U. S. 5th CIRCUIT ORDERING IT TO PERFORM ITS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY: REVERSE THE JULY 25, 2024 JUDGMENT DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE ALL CLAIMS OF ALL PLAINTIFFS ’ IN THEIR STATE COURT FILED SUIT ILLEGALLY REMOVED TO THE W. D. CT. OF LA, SHREVEPORT DIVISION & FOR ALL ORDERS/JUDGMENTS ISSUED BY ANY DISTRICT COURT BE DECLARED VOID SINCE A “USURPATION OF POWER ” WAS COMMITTED BECAUSE ONLY FEDERAL JURISDICTION WAS THAT OF THIS U. S. SUPREME COURT? 3. IS THE U.S. 5™ CIRCUIT NEGLECTING ITS CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION BY REFUSING TO FOLLOW ITS OWN PRECEDENT ISSUED IN: ZIEGLER V. CHAMPION MORTG. CO., ET AL. , 913 F.2d 228 (1990), WHERE ITS OWN MOTION THE APPELLATE COURT REVERSED THE DISTRICT COURT AND REMANDED THE CASE? 5 4. IS THIS SUPREME COURT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE A MANDAMUS TO THE 5th CIRCUIT TO PREFORM ITS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY REVERSING THE DIST. COURT AS IT IS CLEAR THAT FOR PLAINTIFF, L & M HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, INC., THE JULY 25, 2024 JUDGMENT CONFUSES THE STATE COURTS INREGARDS TO ALL PLAINTIFFS PROCEEDING IN THE STATE COURTS AGAINST ALL RESPONDENT, FOR ALL OF THEIR CLAIMS? 5. IS THIS SUPREME COURT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE A MANDAMUS TO THE 5™ CIRCUIT SINCE THERE HAS BEEN JUDGMENTS HAS ISSUED AGAINST THE CORPORATION ON THE MERITS OF ITS CLAIMS AND/OR A MONEY SANCTIONS JUDGMENT ISSUED AGAINST IT ALTHOUGH, IT, NEVER APPEARED IN U. S. COURT? 6. DOES THIS COURT HAS A CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO ISSUE A MANDAMUS TO THE 5th CIRCUIT ORDERING IT TO PERFORM ITS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY AND DECLARE ALL JUDGMENTS VOID ISSUED BY ALL THE DISTRICT COURTS BECAUSE THEY COMMITTED A “USURPATION OF POWER, ” AND THE VOID JUDGMENTS HAVE CAUSED AND CONTINUE TO CAUSE THE STATE COURTS TO SUSTAIN RES JUDICATA ? 6