No. 25-6047

Peter Bormuth v. Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, aka EGLE

Lower Court: Michigan
Docketed: 2025-11-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment administrative-law due-process precedent religious-freedom standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause require state administrative tribunals to follow their own clearly established precedent? Do religious beliefs provide grounds for special interest or special damages for standing purposes?

Question Presented (from Petition)

Two questions are presented: 1. Does the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause require state administrative tribunals to follow their own clearly established precedent? 2. Do religious beliefs provide grounds for special interest or special damages for standing purposes?

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-11
Waiver of right of respondents Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy to respond filed.
2025-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 8, 2025)

Attorneys

Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy
Ann Maurine ShermanMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Ann Maurine ShermanMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Peter Bormuth
Peter Bormuth — Petitioner
Peter Bormuth — Petitioner