No. 25-6054
Response WaivedRelisted (4)IFP
Tags: appellate-procedure circuit-split constitutional-review firearms-regulation statutory-interpretation writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment
SecondAmendment
Latest Conference:
2026-01-16
(distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a writ of certiorari should be granted to settle the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(l) given the Circuit Courts of Appeals and District Courts are split
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether, because the Circuit Courts of Appeals and District Courts are split, a writ of certiorari should be granted to settle the Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(l). 1
Docket Entries
2026-01-20
Petition DENIED.
2026-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
2026-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 8, 2025)
Attorneys
Clyde Miller
James Matthew Branden — Law Office of James M. Branden, Petitioner
James Matthew Branden — Law Office of James M. Branden, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent