No. 25-6055
Tamori Morgan v. United States
Tags: arms-classification constitutional-interpretation firearm-regulation historical-tradition second-amendment statutory-prohibition
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-12-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a handgun and handheld pistol that fire automatically constitute 'arms' under the Second Amendment's plain text, thus requiring the government to justify the prohibition under 18 U.S.C. § 922(o)(1) by demonstrating that it is consistent with the Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether a handgun and handheld pistol that fire automatically constitute “arms” under the Second Amendment’s plain text, thus requiring the government to justify the proh ibition under 18 U.S. C. § 922(o)(1) by demonstrating that it is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation?
Docket Entries
2025-12-08
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
2025-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2025-11-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 8, 2025)
Attorneys
Tamori Morgan
United States of America
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent