No. 25-6069
Samuel Lee Smith, Jr. v. Florida
Tags: access-to-courts appeal-dismissal due-process florida-supreme-court judicial-procedure legal-defense
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Florida Supreme Court wrongly dismiss the Petitioner's appeal by preventing him from defending himself and depriving him of access to the Courts?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. Did the Florida Supreme Court wrongly dismiss that the Petitioner ’s appeal because it effectively prevented the Petitioner from defending himself in Court and deprived him of access to the Courts? 2
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 10, 2025)