Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari to review a lower court's decision regarding sentencing and appeals process

/\JVQU &Jt| %4rk O'D'^fS llLOl <1-1 e. OtoLuUltj ® \AJkkcj is \(v^0LiAcuie Clu&m nz4 bdrvj z\^pl?W 4o jaW£M j^ iw& pjnadr&& 1^-k) Leuv k| Aftz. Q^&caJ A^Z^nWy . @ lO/y is 4Kc 4U c4 4IB5IQ& W bek ^ppbW Co-fn^cHy <-|o T^MWfS Se/bJ^n^Aowi Ar^-ft 'hfctc 4VircT4g1n oia4 kd<^ TXft McU feW^ SmW a* 4^ O^n^6^/ o± HB5N9. Qj) UJktj /5 4A.'s +rm£CalcLtlfjUS^ 3^1 1 n/)'f~ b^i^ &ddL Cotlcudcd[^J prc^clij creJLidid c7d 4-)/n^ bdbn dJitf "ky Mzx . e^cLe.. 5^I 2 02.3 \dY\t CS ZX proper pe.f9y>\S CdSptnOSjhk +6T nZHr /2f&Xf-hAC| 'bft'Yl^L .SSfM lc/ /aCCiH_irti&iLl-f. '(o\ flfrL CbMMuai&thr\t krvipg a Am MwttixS skor-llAje&te 6n a 13y€A-\r ^S^^nsdanzir ^£f\l£rv_p aJct.r\ &SC-I Goac£4 1'r>w 4>y 2Z) 4at|5 S-^fU'^ct ? u £z)uri? Ta i^WizhWs. -ftn? lAJAit !<=> tfyrhcnjefS Jz3ul-fehnn€ ( L)£ potc4m OT ’ Z?£>rr£enb^^ 44zmL( ? L/Dhift bod-S T^sptoYkrJgiven 5b many bu 4k& I/Svcu (YiCA SuD^p.^ 1-e.en w ”fD oc4M-mxs 4^M zw r c mJ It QUESTION(S) PRESENTED VJlui iX nJ' ClLU k> a<pp&d> \J& • ScaD/Y jT^ ^Lri/id?-a d&£/Si^ \J(X. CbiArU D<n/$ iHS'kzxd' 3er\454y2%iaK44-0 -14^ U.S. Sixorm^ toizc'k 4o z>iU4/£ ss / ^his /na+kr ?.