No. 25-6089

Curtis Solomon v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2025-11-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-procedure circuit-precedent due-process panel-rule stare-decisis statutory-right
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2026-01-09
Related Cases: 25-6137 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eleventh Circuit's 'prior panel precedent rule' contravenes principles of vertical stare decisis and denies defendants their statutory right to appeal and due process of law

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Whether the Eleventh Circuit’s recent iteration of its “prior panel precedent rule’—which requires rigid adherence to prior circuit precedent, even if the prior precedent indisputably did not apply a new “mode of analysis” dictated by an intervening decision of this Court—contravenes well settled principles of vertical stare decisis, and denies Eleventh Circuit defendants their statutory right to appeal and due process of law, in conflict with the approach of other circuits. i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no

Docket Entries

2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-11-18
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-11-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 12, 2025)
2025-09-16
Application (25A299) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until November 6, 2025.
2025-09-11
Application (25A299) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 7, 2025 to November 6, 2025, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Curtis Solomon
Brenda Greenberg BrynFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Brenda Greenberg BrynFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent