No. 25-6097
Shanna M. Glynn v. Marquette City Police Department, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process judicial-review stare-decisis state-accountability victim-rights
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2026-01-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can stare decisis deny a victim of violent crime their right to due process and full and fair review?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : Page: 2 I. QUESTIONS i. Can stare decisis deny a victim of violent crime, their right to due process and full and fair review? ii. Does Hans v. Louisiana remove the requirement that states serve their citizens, be held accountable by them, and uphold the U.S. Constitution? iii. Does current common law require that I name innocent parties as defendants in order to be heard? II.
Docket Entries
2026-01-20
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until February 10, 2026, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2025-12-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
2025-12-11
Waiver of right of respondent State of Michigan to respond filed.
2025-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2025)
Attorneys
State of Michigan
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent