No. 25-6105
Brittany Lyn Isaacson v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-challenge facial-as-applied-challenge firearm-possession second-amendment statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
SecondAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-12-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, both facially and as applied to Ms. Isaacson, in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 US. 1 (2022) and United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. 680 (2024).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, both facially and as applied to Ms. Isaacson, in light of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 US. 1 (2022) and United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. 680 (2024)
Docket Entries
2026-02-06
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2026-02-06
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2026-01-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 6, 2026.
2025-12-31
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-12-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 7, 2026 to February 6, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-08
Response Requested. (Due January 7, 2026)
2025-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-18
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-11-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2025)
Attorneys
Brittany Lyn Isaacson
Emily Marie Harris — Harris, Harris & Quinn, P.C., Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent