1. Constitutional Validity of FISA Warrants Obtained Through Systematic Perjury and
Evidence Fabrication
Whether this nation will tolerate FISA warrants built on a foundation of lies—where federal
agents deliberately violated 50 U.S.C. § 1804(a)'s sacred oath requirement and sworn statement
of facts mandate by knowingly submitting perjured affidavits fabricating 3,4-
methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) use the eve FISA was to expire, contradicted by
over 90 consecutive negative drug tests that prove their deception, systematically violated §
1804(a)(12)'s certification requirement through reckless disregard for exculpatory evidence that
would expose their crimes, and engaged in a 30-count criminal conspiracy under FISC to renew
FISA warrants through evidence fabrication including the Pittsburgh FBI's unconscionable
chemical substitution of non-scheduled hygiene and food additives for 3,4-
methylenedioxymethamphetamine molecular components as substitutions for MDMA under 18
U.S.C. § 1519—and whether such government lawlessness can ever satisfy the Fourth
Amendment and due process demands that Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), and Brady
v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), require of a government that claims to serve justice.

2. Separation of Powers Violations and Executive Accountability Under FISA
Whether the government's brazen orchestration of a systematic criminal conspiracy against
American justice —including The Pittsburgh FBI's impersonation and forgeries under the banner
of Justice of Article III courts through fraudulent judicial decisions pertaining to the petitioner
under the banner of Justice using the deceptive magistrate and appellate court guise, also
deliberate dereliction by Amicus Curiae in failing to advocate under 50 U.S.C. § 1803(i)(4) and §
1803(1), and the transformation of FISA's congressionally designed civil liberties protections into
a mechanism for constitutional evasion —represents the kind of lawless government tyranny that
this Court was established to stop, constitutes such a profound separation-of-powers violation
that it deprives petitioner of legitimate judicial review, and demands immediate Supreme Court
intervention to restore the principle that no person stands above the law, particularly in light of
Martin v. United States, 605 U.S. (2025).

3. Constitutional Limits on Secret Surveillance and Heightened Judicial Scrutiny
Whether courts must finally fulfill their constitutional duty to apply heightened scrutiny when
FISA surveillance stands exposed as the product of systematic constitutional violations and
scientifically proven perjuries that have transformed Congress's carefully constructed
safeguards —the mandatory protections of 50 U.S.C. § 1803(i)(4), § 1803(1), the disclosure
requirements of § 1804(a)(12), and the factual foundation requirements that form the bedrock of
lawful surveillance —into meaningless legislative theater through twelve years of FISA
operations whose investigative cover has been definitively blown, laying bare the systematic
unlawful FISA renewals designed not to protect national security but to avoid accountability for
federal crimes, thus ensuring that the promise of constitutional

Whether FISA warrants obtained through systematic perjury and evidence fabrication violate constitutional due process and Fourth Amendment protections