No. 25-6119
Charvez Brooks v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure ends-of-justice judicial-continuance speedy-trial-act statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2025-12-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Speedy Trial Act's "ends of justice" provision, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), permits open-ended continuances that lack a definite termination date, like in the First, Third, Sixth, and Tenth Circuits, or instead requires any ends-of-justice continuance to exclude time only for a specifically bounded period supported by contemporaneous findings, as the Second and Ninth Circuit hold.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Speedy Trial Act's 'ends of justice' provision permits open-ended continuances without a definite termination date
Docket Entries
2025-12-15
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/12/2025.
2025-11-20
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-11-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2025)
Attorneys
Charvez Brooks
Meghan Suzanne Skelton — SkeltonLaw, LLC, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent