No. 25-612
Scot Van Oudenhoven v. Wisconsin Department of Justice
Tags: criminal-record expungement federal-law firearms-prohibition state-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2026-02-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the word 'expunged' in 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(B)(ii) apply to all expungements under state law, or require a complete undoing of a conviction's effects?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
1. Does the word “expunged” in 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(B)(ii) apply to all expungements under state law, or does an expungement under state law have to completely undo the effects of a conviction?
Docket Entries
2026-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-02-02
Reply of Scot Van Oudenhoven submitted.
2026-02-02
Reply of petitioner Scot Van Oudenhoven filed. (Distributed)
2026-01-16
Brief of Wisconsin Department of Justice in opposition submitted.
2026-01-16
Brief of respondent Wisconsin Department of Justice in opposition filed.
2025-12-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 16, 2026.
2025-12-16
Motion of Wisconsin Department of Justice for an extension of time submitted.
2025-12-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2025 to January 16, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2025)
2025-08-29
Application (25A245) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until November 21, 2025.
2025-08-27
Application (25A245) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 22, 2025 to November 21, 2025, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Scot Van Oudenhoven
John R. Monroe — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
John R. Monroe — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Wisconsin Department of Justice
Brian Patrick Keenan — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
Brian Patrick Keenan — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent