No. 25-6127
Brodrick Eugene Davis v. United States
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g) violate the Fifth and Sixth amendments?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g) violate the Fifth and Sixth amendments?
Docket Entries
2026-02-13
Brief of United States of America in opposition submitted.
2026-02-13
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2026-01-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 13, 2026.
2026-01-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 14, 2026 to February 13, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 14, 2026.
2025-12-11
Motion of United States of America for an extension of time submitted.
2025-12-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 15, 2025 to January 14, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 15, 2025)
Attorneys
Brodrick Davis
United States of America
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent