No. 25-6131
Zeno E. Sims v. Chris Brewer, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: concurrent-sentencing federal-court judicial-discretion legal-precedent sentencing-procedure state-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should revisit Setser and affirmatively hold that once a federal court runs a future state court sentence concurrently to a defendant's federal sentence, the state court is bound to run its sentence concurrently?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should revisit Setser and affirmatively hold that once a federal court runs a future state court sentence concurrently to a defendant's federal sentence, the state court is bound to run its sentence concurrently?
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-11-25
Waiver of Warden Brewer of right to respond submitted.
2025-11-25
Waiver of right of respondent Warden Brewer to respond filed.
2025-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 17, 2025)
Attorneys
Warden Brewer
Patrick Joseph Logan — Missouri Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Zeno Sims
Kevin Louis Schriener — Law & Schriener, LLC, Petitioner