No. 25-6133
Richard Barry Randolph v. Florida, et al.
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Punishment HabeasCorpus Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Florida violated the Supremacy Clause by constructing a system of post-conviction litigation that provides no avenue for the assertion of applicable rules of federal constitutional law.
2. Whether Florida denied Mr. Randolph minimal due process involving clemency.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Florida violated the Supremacy Clause by constructing a system of post-conviction litigation that provides no avenue for the assertion of applicable rules of federal constitutional law and whether Florida denied Mr. Randolph minimal due process involving clemency
Docket Entries
2025-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2025-11-20
Application (25A577) referred to the Court.
2025-11-20
Application (25A577) for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Thomas and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
2025-11-19
Brief of State of Florida in opposition submitted.
2025-11-19
Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
2025-11-19
Response to application from respondent Florida filed.
2025-11-19
Reply of Richard Randolph submitted.
2025-11-19
Reply of applicant Richard Randolph filed.
2025-11-19
Reply of petitioner Richard Randolph filed.
2025-11-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
2025-11-17
Application (25A577) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Richard Randolph
James L. Driscoll Jr. — James L. Driscoll Jr., Petitioner
State of Florida
Scott Andrew Browne — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent