No. 25-6148
Jehan Semper v. Scott Bessent, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference:
2026-01-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court's failure to consider an indigent pro se plaintiff's filings violates constitutional due process and access to justice
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Constitutional and Civil Rights District Court 1. District Court FAILS to Consider Indigent Pro Se Plaintiffs Filings and Motions Whatsoever. Is it a violation of rights protected by the constitution, civil rights, right of equitable access to justice and/or error, abuse of discretion, arbitrary act, capricious act or otherwise improper act or decision when the district court refused to consider indigent pro se Plaintiffs filings and motions by way of Romero's (116) [
Docket Entries
2026-01-20
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
2025-12-15
Waiver of Federal Respondents of right to respond submitted.
2025-12-15
Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
2025-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2025)
Attorneys
Federal Respondents
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent