No. 25-6151
Christopher Lewis Tucker v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure medication-administration pretrial-custody sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation supervised-release
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a twenty-five year term of supervised release with stringent special conditions including forced medication 'greater than necessary' to satisfy statutory sentencing purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for a defendant who languished in pretrial custody for over five years?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Is a twenty -five year term of supervised release with stringent special conditions including the forced administration of medication “greater than necessary” to satisfy the statutory purposes of sentencing enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in the context of a criminal defendant who “ languished in pretrial custody for more than five years.” waiting for a competency evaluation ? ii LIST OF ALL DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-03
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-11-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 18, 2025)
Attorneys
Christopher Tucker
Eric Joseph Brignac — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Eric Joseph Brignac — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent