No. 25-6158
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance right-to-counsel sixth-amendment trial-court
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
APPOINT SUBSTITUTE 10 TCOnN <S?T'S REFUS AL to
nock's SIXTH AMENDMENT URSTrmt VI0LATED MR.
representation ? DMENT RIGHT To effective
■noc™sR fifth amendment right 1 J1™ mr-
tktXT a lay ™ess to XS
3' loss HER amo"VIS™nflicts RT wi™ALC pLATION 0F
cEoSS ISHED BY other^ uit^ thTS eE
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court's refusal to appoint a substitute counsel violated petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to effective representation
Docket Entries
2026-01-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 19, 2026.
2026-01-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 20, 2026 to February 19, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-12-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 20, 2026.
2025-12-12
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 19, 2025 to January 20, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-11-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2025)
Attorneys
John Nock
John Nock — Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent