No. 25-616
Juston D. Beyer v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-procedure court-of-appeals discretionary-review judicial-review military-justice
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2026-01-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces abuse its discretion by failing to grant review?
Question Presented (from Petition)
Petitioner made an unrebutted showing of good cause to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces to review his case. Nevertheless, the court denied review. Did the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces abuse its discretion by failing to grant review ?
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
Petition DENIED.
2025-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-12-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-11-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2025)
2025-09-22
Application (25A324) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 28, 2025.
2025-09-17
Application (25A324) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 29, 2025 to November 28, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Juston Beyer
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent