Whether the Fifth Circuit and U.S.D.C. misinterpreted state law and Supreme Court precedent regarding ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and reasonable expectation of privacy

1. THE FIFTH CIRCUIT AND THE U.S.D.C’S DECISION THAT A MANDATORY REQUIRED PIECE OF THE REPORTER'S RECORD THAT IS MISSING IS AN ISSUE OF STATE LAW AND IS UNREVIEWABLE BY THE COURTS, OVERLOOKS THE ACTUAL GROUND IN INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF APPELLATE COUNSEL AND IS MISINTERPRETED REQUIRING THIS COURT'S ATTENTION. 2. THE FIFTH CIRCUIT AND U.S.D.C.'S DECISION AND AGREEING UPON THAT "IT IS WELL SETTLED THAT A NON-OVERNIGHT GUEST, SUCH AS PUENTE, HAS NO REASONABLE EX PECTATION OF PRIVACY IN A RESIDENCE THAT HE DOES NOT OWN OR HAVE A POSSESSORY INTEREST" OVERREACH AND MISAPPLY ACTUAL SUPREME COURT AUTHORITY REQUIRING THIS COURT'S ATTENTION.