No. 25-618

Craig Jonathan Warner v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2025-12-01
Status: Pending
Type: Paid
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process false-testimony fourteenth-amendment witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2026-02-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. At least ten states' courts and four federal circuit courts recognize that a state's unknowing presentation of false testimony denies a defendant due process. At least three states' courts and five federal circuit courts hold the opposite: only the knowing presentation of false testimony violates the Fourteenth Amendment. Which side of the split is correct?

2. At Petitioner's trial on charges of sexually abusing two girls, the State of Texas called two witnesses who falsely testified that a swab of one girl's vagina tested positive for a protein unique to semen. Was the false testimony material, as the trial court concluded but the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals rejected?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the knowing or unknowing presentation of false testimony by a state violates a defendant's due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment

Docket Entries

2026-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2025-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 31, 2025)

Attorneys

Craig Jonathan Warner
Brett Evan OrdiwayOrdiway PLLC, Petitioner