No. 25-6194

Douglas P. Pasquinzo v. Montana

Lower Court: Montana
Docketed: 2025-11-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights montana-law ninth-circuit procedural-due-process prosecutorial-amendment subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2026-01-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether state courts violate procedural due process by allowing prosecutors to amend complaints without judicial leave, thereby lacking subject-matter jurisdiction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

1) Where the State^Courts continue to disobey the Laws and Rulescof Procedure, and allow County Prosecutors to Amend complaints, v.-i without leave from the State.court and its jurists, as a violation of Procedural Due Process Rights, guaranteed by the State and Federal Constitutions, and where then the required subject-matter jurisdiction tp proceed is then lacking, causing a unlawful conviction. 2) This issue has been brought before the United States Supreme Court repeatedly by others, and overlooked, asithe record shows, and in the Ninth Circuit only to be ignored, allowing the State to convict others in violation of Constitutional and Statutory Rights, will the Court's Clerks Sallow a Justice to review this continuing assault of Rights in Montana?

Docket Entries

2026-01-26
Petition DENIED.
2026-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/23/2026.
2025-09-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 22, 2025)

Attorneys

Douglas P. Pasquinzo
Douglas P. Pasquinzo — Petitioner
Douglas P. Pasquinzo — Petitioner