No. 25-6206
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: bill-of-attainder constitutional-interpretation federal-questions heck-v-humphrey judicial-error supreme-court-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2026-01-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Alaska Supreme Court misapply Heck v. Humphrey and violate the Bill of Attainder prohibition in a decision of national importance?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
TION(S) PRESENTED I. DID THE ALASKA SUPREME COURT MISAPPLY HECK V. HUMPHREY. II. DOES THE ALASKA SUPREME COURT'S ERROR UNDERMINE THE BILL OF ATTAINDER PROHIBITION III. IS THIS ISSUE OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE IV. DOES THIS DECISION BY THE ALASKA SUPREME COURT AVOID FEDERAL QUESTIONS?
Docket Entries
2026-01-26
Petition DENIED.
2026-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/23/2026.
2025-12-17
Waiver of right of respondent Alaska to respond filed.
2025-06-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 24, 2025)
Attorneys
State of Alaska
Georgia R. Smithee — Alaska Department of Law, Respondent
Georgia R. Smithee — Alaska Department of Law, Respondent