WHETHER THE APPELLATE COURT ERRED IN AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT'S DECISION TO PROFFER NOT ONE BUT TWO DISTINCT ALLEN INSTRUCTIONS WHERE THE JURY WAS ALREADY HELPLESSLY DEADLOCKS THEREBY VIOLATING PETITIONER'S FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PROPER DUE PROCESS UNDER THE LAW AS WELL AS HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO BE TRIED BEFORE AN IMPARTIAL JURY?

Whether the appellate court erred in affirming the district court's decision to proffer two distinct Allen instructions when the jury was already hopelessly deadlocked, thereby violating the petitioner's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights