DueProcess Takings Privacy Jurisdiction
Whether the Nebraska Supreme Court has decided an important federal question regarding disclosure of evidence at trial in violation of constitutional due process rights
The Nebraska Supreme Court denied a petition for rehearing of the decision of the Nebraska Supreme Court which affirmed convictions and sentences of consecutive terms of life for first-degree murder, 50 to 60 years’ imprisonment, with a ten year mandatory minimum, for use of a weapon to commit a felony and 10 to 20 years’ imprisonment, with a three year mandatory minimum, for tampering with evidence. The question presented is: 1. Whether the Nebraska Supreme Court has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by the United States Supreme Court or has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of the United States Supreme Court in respect to disclosure of evidence at trial after the witnesses at issue had already testified in violation of Ramos’ rights to a fair trial and due process under the 5" 6", and 14" i Amendments to the United States Constitution. |