Me fiouids Abused rU cVscoehoiJ in vlqjiesilQ€3 Comped, LxDheu Me decl we 4o etfeecise suppkwd jmzisiudwo o\fe£ ChJq $We to Qfl. defied of VbS I^wssd 4o AmeuA his ComplAnd^1) =T)id W Cmds Abused ik discoeW, m Vjqn£sj$83 CovoplAi4bq <d\GmiSSwQ } pj OosAjudqrne^t qooAwm 4o A/neod jajMoKimcj becVeftM PfuAe of 1 dx\)A rxioc-eduQje f&fe)*

2) ~L><\ The. QjQuds Abused vk dvscoeto, >h VlqxiekCompliiA "GoO. Pq_HV)O gux\Woa 'Ao pQoceedQXFP^ poujpeok o*j <sppefd lOVhcV) CooSbVuks a Chiolieioqe A-o Me cGsVkA CpuefL Ce(A0ed<<>>o Auq cpped uoould mV be ix) qood

3}?iXc.\ Abe CoaiAs Abused Is dvsc-QeVato nJ \h)q\ze's§ CompliQiid to»q dvsvntssoA, Ane SWAe QC"Tem Audi SU$e CaM uodee. dooUitCe of' so\fe(2.e\GC AMmudAq^ # t <wdl Ckims fiqAiiOs+ ^Jo*)e bq oUsossitoq hrs (dtwfi AqflwM +jioche( ftrime£, Mieto P^rzUee. flvd? "Ted Dcebble#., A>tas he Alleged feU , demoqsVjzxAwq U^eq Co^piesd im VtoliAe his (kjoAtMiobfL PjqvHs bq )/jJrzoctaciiOq z ikJflcfmissjbte Liw5u3C>$2A uotAwess swAevneol i?Ao evidence duQjMq hi's O.i2ww£d □Pocesdt^

(p). L^ki CoucAs abused Vk dvscftedtoto. iq \Aqpe sJ A&3 Oxwdaid s^heoe 'Atoe, (Louek Sbded jdPo&tobleli , AAlqizes OouoA- QppoixAscy AAoQmq uovys kJoA A(d-iK)q -norites ColoiZ. oO SUfe to AM buopose of lQ^3 bdcdiAq / ujbeM fljqpQfisetohijq Wqpe tjj his Cownntod {aRjOCsadlocp

<f i' • Msee Comiukwq

Did the Courts abuse their discretion in dismissing the plaintiff's complaint through various procedural rulings that allegedly violated constitutional due process rights?