Question not identified.

No question identified. : QUESTI ONS PRESENTED FOR REVI EW I. WAS MR. SKYLER ’S PLEA OF GUILTY KNOW ING OR VOLUNTARY, WHEN THE FACTUAL BASIS IS INSUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH A VIOLATION OF THE HOBBS ACT OR A CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE THE HOBBS ACT? II. DID THE DISTRICT COURT'S FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THE REQUIREM ENTS OF RULE 11 VIOLATE DUE PROCESS AND MR. SKYLER ’ S SUBSTANTIAL RIGHTS ? III. WAS THE FACTUAL BASIS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT MR. SKYLER’ S HOBBS ACT CONSPIRACY CONVICTION ? IV. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY ALLOW ING THE GOVERNM ENT TO VIOLATE THE PLEA AGREEM ENT ? V. DID THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERR BY NOT FOLLOW ING THIS COURT’S HOLDING IN SANTOBELLO v. NEW YORK , 404 U.S. 2 57 (1971) ii