Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the right to due process on appeal is violated when an appellate court relies on an argument not presented by the government, despite the party presentation principle
Question Presented (from Petition)
the Court should grant certiorari, vacate the Second Circuit judgment, and remand the case in light of the recent order in Clark v. Sweeney, 607 USS. -, 2025 WL 3260170 (2025). 3. Whether, as some circuit courts have held, a general appeal waiver set forth in a signed plea agreement does not apply to appellate claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, or whether, as the Second Circuit assumed in this case, and as other circuits have previously determined, appeal waivers that do not mention ineffective assistance of counsel claims may be interpreted to preclude such claims on appeal. i
2026-02-02
Memorandum for the United States of United States submitted.
2026-02-02
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2025-12-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 2, 2026.
2025-12-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 2, 2026 to February 2, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-11-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 2, 2026)
2025-10-17
Application (25A313) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until November 28, 2025.
2025-10-08
Application (25A313) to extend further the time from October 29, 2025 to November 28, 2025, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2025-09-19
Application (25A313) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until October 29, 2025.
2025-09-11
Application (25A313) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 29, 2025 to October 29, 2025, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.