Marcus Brent Fields v. Pfizer Inc., et al.
a) Pfizer Defendands Knew there Courd ~ TO yotene Lot RA boy ,
Could ~ Cause more Sever and or Heard damage body orguns damage
eS pecially Ceeapmet Amongust Blas iA America: g
GY Ob PF zee Tac Defendants Know they broke Vote Law by belbery Extartlon « Rah bessigm ent > and breaking WS Theasuory ~ Banking Secerey
AC: cybercrime and Tatecfol Liaw Tadecnultonad viokalttens by Apt |
Com Plect ing theough Pharmacutital Thal Phases 44 1-2-3 on bhavks foo:
@ id Defendants Profit shifting ~ Pacsonal @Na Com Pany ASSES4> money
eLfoct hole moral-charitr in less Saktey Precrations more @ bess
Lan Cartas ahowk Pubte- Consurdte each y in manufacturing, gualdey.
Lor a Sukie oF CORBA oh Foe a bedder Anofle maak by Ke fndtvudtal
Conswmtr — Provider coucd. I~ vnecine educcdton } bad Side e4FtL4s - 95 Tm suber
D- MA Phiver Tac Vefendanks break: Drwg Enforcemind Admasy -abfon
Tederal LawS - violations. FUleh: = Sandtons — PenalfTies - Sus@entruns
S- Qsd of (zee Rerfendanks break Secerittes Exchange crm mission Mule
= Cedecal Law ~ Wolations —curles. > Sanctions ~ Palittes. suspention 4 Eines
@ Ord Phizer (\eLendaats break ~ Federal Teade commission vues
= Vv rolatinns < Cules— Sandbions - Pon Wes- SubPpiatsers Cine .
D Did PL ze Dafendands - Brenle our WS. Canstiuttenal ~ ein
a, \ » * .
Acdicle TE Sectton A * Section + Acdte \N section |
Did Pfizer defendants violate federal laws through drug development, profit shifting, and regulatory non-compliance?